Archive for January 22nd, 2006
I spent most of Saturday glued to my television.
I’m nearly always glued to a tv somewhere, I was superglued to one as a child and haven’t been able to become unstuck since. It’s just another of my many addictions.
Silly as this may sound, I was watching the efforts to save that Northern Bottlenosed Whale in the Thames as was apparently, most of the world.
Ok, I’m a sucker for sentimentality, but in our empty, meaningless lives, aren’t we all? Wasn’t everyone rooting for the whale?
I spent hours watching the live coverage on SKY NEWS, who seemed to have all angles covered as rescuers attempted to save the stricken whale.
It popped up in central London on Friday, swimming past many London landmarks, attracting crowds and the media. They hinted that the whale might have been injured or sick, but kept our hopes high for that happy ending.
On Saturday, they actually tried to do something. They caught it, tested it and tried to transport it to the open sea. It died on a ship, on the way, around 7pm.
I had a feeling it wasn’t going to be good news from the journey, so I put on movie instead. “Capote”, was the film and it was a dodgy pirate copy given to me by someone. I don’t think it’s out yet here in the UK.
Good film, excellent performance by Philip Seymour Hoffman in the central role. He should win some awards. It’s about the late author, Truman Capote and his four-years spent writing “In Cold Blood”. “In Cold Blood” tells the story of the murders of four family members in the American mid-west, at a time in society when events like this still held some shock value.
They don’t anymore.
It’s a classic book and is required reading for anyone who is interested in the decline of modern society. Some might argue that Capote highlighted a point, an event that marked the beginning of this downward spiral.
When I finished the film and returned to satellite television, the big red banner on SKY NEWS said the whale had died. This upset me far more deeply than it should have.
Why?
Because I’m a hard, heartless bastard most of the time; at least I try to be. Life is too full of pain and hurt and bitter disappointment to be anything else.
So why did the whale’s sad tale effect me as it did?
It all comes back to our sad and empty lives, which we all struggle to fill with meaning. Thankfully modern life throws up all sorts of distractions and diversions to prevent us from dwelling on these facts for too long.
I’ve got my consumer electronics and tv channels up the wazoo. I’ve got the internet, but so do you, or you wouldn’t be wasting your valuable surfing time on my blog.
And by waste, of course I mean life-enhancing experience!
And let’s not forget that dynamic duo of drugs and alcohol. Actually, it’s not a duo, as alcohol is a drug too, any fool knows that. And you can trust me, as I’m any fool!
What made the coverage of the whale’s death more bearable was that another domestic story broke just minutes after the whale’s demise was confirmed. It was a good, old-fashioned political sex scandal!
And this one had all the elements that make a British political sex scandal particularly entertaining; a high profile resignation from senior party post, a withdrawal from a leadership contest, a wife, 2 children and gay sex for money! Who could ask for anything more?
Not the News of the World, a Sunday tabloid newspaper, which sniffed out the story. Here, read it for yourselves, it’s a TABLOID CLASSIC!
The one surprising thing in this story of the political party involved, normally it’s the Tories, but I guess since David “let’s legalise drugs and be the hippy’s political hero” Cameron took over, all that’s behind them!
No, this time it was the Liberal Democrats, though I think they are pushing the liberal part just a bit far this time!
Mark Oaten is the MP involved and he was in a senior role in the party, the Home Affairs spokesperson. Or should I say Home Extra-Marital Affairs spokesman, because Homo Affairs spokesperson would just be a cheap shot!
And one last observation on this whole sordid affair; isn’t the term “rent boy’ a bit pejorative?
In these wildly PC times we live in, should we really be referring to 23-year old man as a “rent boy”? Isn’t it insulting?
Every newspaper and media outlet, tv, radio, you name it, has all called the young man a “rent boy” and that can’t be right?
Certainly in these enlightened times, where 65% OF RESPONDENTS IN A RECENT SEX POLL, said that prostitution should be legal, we should be using more socially acceptable language.
Might I suggest in future, we call them “male prostitutes” or “gay sex industry workers”. It’s only right.
Hey, you know what, I think my new blog is doing the trick. I’m back to my old self already!
So if you’re a first time visitor or an old-school hippyfan, thanks for stopping by! You’ve discovered one of the coolest undiscovered websites on the internet; it’s not that I’m not popular, I prefer to see it as I’m still underground! It won’t be long before the mainstream media is sucking my hippycock! They will be begging me to come play in their traditional media world!
But back to you! Well done for finding me and joining my exclusive club. Bookmark me; or better yet, grab one of my many syndication feeds! You know it’s the right thing to do!
Until next time, my beloved hippyfans and fuckers alike, I’ve got spliffs to smoke and pizzas to order!