The only “think tank” in the UK, focussed on drug pol­icy has called the cur­rent gov­ern­ment con­sul­ta­tion “a sham”. They will pub­lish a report this week which explains how badly cur­rent drug laws have failed.

Here, check out this arti­cle from today’s Observer news­pa­per, which I will pro­vide in full:

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0„2195985,00.html

=================================================
Drugs strat­egy debate ‘is a sham’

Think-tank says pro­hi­bi­tion has failed and wants talks on legal­i­sa­tion as Home Office defends ban

Jamie Doward, home affairs edi­tor
Sun­day, Octo­ber 21, 2007
The Observer

The government’s con­sul­ta­tion on a new 10-year drugs strat­egy is a ‘sham’, accord­ing to one of Britain’s lead­ing think-tanks on nar­cotics, which warns that the cur­rent pol­icy is fuelling a crime epidemic.

The Trans­form Drug Pol­icy Foun­da­tion, the only UK organ­i­sa­tion of its kind to advise the United Nations on such issues, will this week pub­lish a new report claim­ing the cur­rent strat­egy has failed. The report, ‘After the War on Drugs: Tools for the Debate’, claims there is an urgent need for full con­sul­ta­tion on allow­ing the con­trolled sup­ply of ille­gal drugs. ‘It is clear our drug pol­icy can­not con­tinue down the same failed path for­ever,’ the report states. ‘Prohibition’s fail­ure is now widely under­stood and acknowl­edged among key stake­hold­ers in the debate… the polit­i­cal ben­e­fits of pur­su­ing pro­hi­bi­tion are now wan­ing and the polit­i­cal costs of its con­tin­u­a­tion are becom­ing unsustainable.’

The report claims that drug pro­hi­bi­tion has allowed organ­ised crime to con­trol the mar­ket and crim­i­nalised mil­lions of users, putting a huge strain on the jus­tice sys­tem. The Home Office esti­mates that half of all prop­erty crime is linked to fundrais­ing to buy ille­gal drugs. The police claim that drug mar­kets are the main dri­ver of the UK’s bur­geon­ing gun cul­ture. Offi­cial fig­ures released last week showed that drug offences recorded by police had risen 14 per cent in April to June of this year, com­pared with the same period in 2006.

Politi­cians claim tough anti-drugs laws send clear sig­nals to soci­ety. But Trans­form points to a Home Office sur­vey, com­mis­sioned in 2000, which showed the social and eco­nomic costs of heroin and cocaine use were between £10.1 and £17.4 bil­lion — the bulk of which were costs to the vic­tims of drug-related crime.

Over the course of 10 years, a series of dif­fer­ent inquiry reports into UK drugs pol­icy all say the same thing: the pol­icy is mal­func­tion­ing,’ said Steve Rolles, the report’s author. ‘They’ve all been blithely ignored by the gov­ern­ment, which insists it is mak­ing progess.’

Last week, North Wales Police chief con­sta­ble Richard Brun­strom said he would ‘cam­paign hard’ for drugs such as heroin to be legalised. Pre­vi­ously he has said that drugs laws are out of date and that the Mis­use of Drugs Act 1971 should be replaced by a new ‘Sub­stance Mis­use Act’.

Trans­form claims the con­sul­ta­tion process, which fin­ished on Fri­day, was designed to sti­fle debate on drugs pol­icy. ‘The con­sul­ta­tion process has been a sham,’ Rolles said. ‘It hasn’t high­lighted any poli­cies to con­sult on. It’s becom­ing very clear the next 10-year strat­egy is going to be iden­ti­cal to the last one. The whole idea that there is going to be a rad­i­cal change is just not the case.’

The think-tank has taken the unusual step of writ­ing to the Bet­ter Reg­u­la­tion Exec­u­tive, set up to ensure gov­ern­ment runs smoothly, to com­plain that the Prime Min­is­ter, Gor­don Brown, is already mak­ing pol­icy before the con­sul­ta­tion process had finished.

The Prime Min­is­ter sig­nalled ear­lier this year that the gov­ern­ment would reclas­sify cannabis. He also recently insisted the gov­ern­ment would never decrim­i­nalise drugs, some­thing Trans­form argues makes a mock­ery of the con­sul­ta­tion process.

A spokes­woman for the Home Office said: ‘We have under­taken an open con­sul­ta­tion and we wel­come con­struc­tive ideas and views on how we can con­tinue to reduce drug harm. How­ever, the gov­ern­ment is emphat­i­cally opposed to the legal­i­sa­tion of drugs which would increase drug-related harm and break both inter­na­tional and domes­tic law.’
=================================================

They don’t hold back, do they. Here’s my favourite 2 para­graphs again, because I think they actu­ally speak volumes:

“The think-tank has taken the unusual step of writ­ing to the Bet­ter Reg­u­la­tion Exec­u­tive, set up to ensure gov­ern­ment runs smoothly, to com­plain that the Prime Min­is­ter, Gor­don Brown, is already mak­ing pol­icy before the con­sul­ta­tion process had finished.

The Prime Min­is­ter sig­nalled ear­lier this year that the gov­ern­ment would reclas­sify cannabis. He also recently insisted the gov­ern­ment would never decrim­i­nalise drugs, some­thing Trans­form argues makes a mock­ery of the con­sul­ta­tion process.”

Yes, I know you just read them, but they are worth repeating.

The gov­ern­ment has decided the out­come of this rethink on drug pol­icy, prior to think­ing! It reminds me of an old say­ing, “I’ve already made up my mind, please don’t con­fuse me with the facts!”

The facts are not con­fus­ing, they are abun­dantly clear! Why can’t any­one be hon­est about drugs? I mean, besides me!

(read the hippy’s “cannabis truth” series)

(read a lit­tle more truth about cannabis)

Comments are closed.

Search
Categories
Links:

Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_STRING in /home/hippy/public_html/google_verify.php on line 1