Archive for the ‘cannabis’ Category
May 2nd, 2008 | 
Author: I’m starting a new campaign today and I’m going to need help from all of you. It is my desire to see Gordon Brown removed from Number 10. Brown’s been Prime Minister long enough. Too long!
Gordon’s gotta go!
GGG!
Gordon’s
Gotta
Go!
Gordon Brown is by far the worst Prime Minister the United Kingdom has ever had, bar none. Even war-monger Blair had a bit of charm and charisma; Brown is a charisma-free zone.
I could actually cope with Gordon Brown’s stiff and unpleasant demeanour, if it weren’t for his total lack of vision and pointless policies and you know where this is going…
Reclassification…
Yep, I’m a one-issue kinda guy.
The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD) is the independent body which advises the government on drugs policy. No government has ever ignored their recommendations since the board was formed. Ol’ Gordo is preparing to ignore their advice and reclassify cannabis to Class B from its current status of Class C.
The ACMD have reviewed cannabis policy three times in the last several years; the first time Tony Blair and David Blunkett followed their advice and put weed into Class C. See, Blair wasn’t all bad. There was this and Northern Ireland, the rest, well that was all pretty bad.
The second time the ACMD recently reviewed cannabis, they again reached the same conclusion. This was done in the heat of the political firestorm that followed the original declassification decision and it only reaffirmed the move and the government left it alone.
The third review of cannabis was requested by Brown, in light of the “new evidence” of the dangers of cannabis.
The truth is, there is no new evidence, there are just conflicting studies which don’t come to any real conclusions regarding links between mental health problems and cannabis use. That hasn’t stopped the media from trying to whip up a Downing Street inspired shit storm of hysterical spin, painting cannabis as the devil’s weed. It was reefer madness mark II, only these days, most of us know much better.
The ACMD reached the same conclusion on their third review, that cannabis should remain in Class C — the report was delivered to Gordon this week. The contents of the report were leaked to the press several weeks ago though they have yet to be made officially public. Their decision, along with Gordon’s overruling of it is expected to come sometime after yesterday’s local elections.
Now, here’s the cool bit. If Gordon Brown ignores the advice of the ACMD, the members of the ACMD are prepared to publicly resign in disgust. That’s how serious this is.
On top of that, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) are reportedly prepared to reassert the current guidance on cannabis possession, if Gordon does reclassify to Class B. In other words, they will continue to operate as if it was Class C.
Just a quick explanation on the differences between the Class B and Class C — the penalties are exactly the same for production and distribution under both. The end user ends up worse off under B.
Where they differ is when it comes to personal possession — under Class C, you should be cautioned and have the weed confiscated. Under Class C, you can still do time, up to 2 years in prison. Under Class B, there is technically no confiscate and caution option, the penalty for possession is 5 years in the big house.
Anyone with a brain knows that the classification of a drug has little to do with how people view it. Cocaine is Class A, carrying the stiffest penalties for possession, but people still take it. A lot of people, actually.
Since cannabis was declassified, usage has gone down. Since cannabis was declassified, far fewer people are unnecessarily imprisoned for a victimless crime. Since cannabis was declassified, we’ve had a drug policy in this country that was on the verge of sensible (with sensible being completely decriminalised or even better legalised, taxed and sold like liquor).
Gordon’s reason for all of this is the same reason he uses for everything he does. Gordon knows best.
Like fuck he does!
To say that Gordon’s drug policy is creating a complete muddle would be an understatement, like saying an ocean is slightly damp. It’s becoming an unmitigated disaster full of lies, hysteria, missteps, misinformation and decided lack of consistency or honesty.
In other words, for fuck’s sake, what a twat!
I don’t think I’ve ever seen a politician so out of step with his country. He hasn’t a clue what genuine people are like. He can’t relate to any of us, because he is a complete social outsider.
Imagine, if you can, meeting Gordon in your local for a drink. He’d order a pint of whatever you’re having, but then hardly touch it. He’d try to talk to you about fiscal responsibility and moral authority, when you would rather talk about the football or how cool that new Iron Man movie looks. He would stand uncomfortably in the crowd, makings others feel uneasy, yet you would definitely get the sense he thought he was better than you, though you wouldn’t in a month of Sundays ever guess how he justifies it in his head.
Yes, Gordon, you are socially awkward and that was fine when you were the Chancellor and everyone thought you were doing a good job. No one thinks that now! The economy is up the spout, it’s screwed, its fucked and Gordon is to blame.
I’m paying £1.10 a litre for petrol. That’s really bad! (And for my American readers, I reckon that’s about 8 bucks a gallon and you didn’t read that wrong!)
The cost of food is skyrocketing too. But that’s not what is upsetting people at the moment, its the decline in house prices.
The economy here in Blighty has been falsely inflated due to the housing market. House prices were making wild gains, but that’s stopped now. People can’t trade up every year or two because their homes aren’t increasing any more. In some cases, they are decreasing and a term from a long time ago is creeping back:
Negative equity.
That’s a fancy pants way of saying your home is worth less than the amount you owe on your mortgage. It’s wank speak, really and it only matters if you are selling your house. If your house is not on the market, then it doesn’t really matter, but it might be the reason you can’t put your house for sale.
What would you do if you had a 100K loan and your house was only worth 75K. Where would you come up with that extra 25K to pay off the bank, plus interest? You wouldn’t, you’d just keep paying your mortgage and thanking god you have a roof over your head.
No one I know is getting rich or even getting ahead just by working. The people I know who have serious money in the bank, or have leap-frogged the rest of us on the property ladder have done so by making vastly inflated profits on property trading. That’s what has really been driving the economy.
Guess what? The economy is running out of steam and is grinding to a halt, thanks in a large part to the current housing market crash (or should I say crunch so I don’t panic anyone?).
And Gordon is to blame!
As I write this, the local election results are dribbling slowly out of my television. The topline is a simple one, it’s the Labour party’s worst showing in 40 years. They’ve come in third, after the Tories and the Lib Dems.
And Gordon is to blame.
Brown is a political liability.
Oh who am I kidding, he is a liability in every conceivable way.
I don’t think I’ve ever disliked a politician as much as I dislike Gordon Brown.
I have this fantasy that this afternoon, after all the election results are tabulated, certified and released and the true picture of the Labour massacre is confirmed, that a small group of very senior Labour types swing by Number 10 for a private chat with Brown.
In this chat, they ask him to resign asap, right then and there. When he refuses, they tell him if he doesn’t resign his position as Prime Minister, they will invoke a special extraordinary session of Parliament and call for a vote of no confidence in his leadership.
In other words, Gordon can do this the easy way or he can do it the hard way and its his choice.
Gordon is confronted with this difficult decision and he chooses to resign to make it seem like it was his idea. He returns to the back bench where we hardly ever hear from him again.
Or I’ve got another scenario, which I just thought of, just now. He could return to Number 11 and be the Chancellor of the Exchequer again, because of the dire economic outlook, the department needs his expertise again!
Basically, anything that ends his premiership before he can fuck up anything else is good with me.
I’ve even got a catch phrase for you. You can use it as a greeting, when you meet people. Better yet, you can use it to sign off letters and emails. Maybe I should get tee-shirts printed. How can we lose when we have my winning slogan? Go on, chant along with me!
GGG!
Gordon’s gotta go!
GGG!
GORDON’S GOTTA GO!
GGG!
GORDON’S
GOTTA
GO!
Three G’s means Gordon’s not for me!
GGG!
Gordon’s gotta go!
GGG!
Are you all with me?
(While we’re on the subject of weed, check out the northlondonhippy’s cannabis truth series.)
(deadline for entry now extended until the 1st of June 2008)
Attention: Hippyfans!
As previewed in a recent post, I am pleased to announce my latest and dare I say greatest contest, ever!
Better than when you gave away your old bong?
Oh yes!
Better than when you gave away your old car?
Nobody won my old car, so I swapped it for an ounce of skunk.
Better than when you gave away even yourself?
Oh come on, a gift-wrapped turd would be better than that!
This time, I’m going to be giving away a brand new, shiny, Midnight Blue Bushmaster Bubbler, just like mine!
I’ve had one of these Bushmaster Bubblers for quite a while now and it is genuinely one of the sweetest pieces I own. It’s perfect for chilling out on the sofa, watching TV and getting pleasantly toasted. You can smoke your favourite herbal mixture in it.
Personally, I prefer pure skunky bud.
Not only am I going to give away this amazingly well crafted piece of glassware, but I’m also going to include 10x glass gauze, because I know you’re going to end up losing them.
But there’s more…
Five very lucky runners up will receive Smiley Face — Head Case — Pop Tins. I have a couple of them and they are very useful. And you might have noticed, the classic smiley face makes an appearance in the banner at the top of this page. So, we’ll be like, just so, you know, connected!
And ten “we didn’t lose, but we’re not huge winners” will receive one pack of Dragonfly Kingsized Premium Flavoured Rolling Papers, which come in Blueberry, Chocolate, Cherry, Coconut and Strawberry — yum! The flavour you receive will be chosen at random, by me.
Actually, everything I’m giving away in this contest is being provided by me, though clearly from the links provided, I’m buying it all from my friends at EDIT. In other words, EDIT aren’t responsible for this contest in any way, so if you have any questions about it, please contact me directly.
Oh and I’m paying for the postage too, but if you have problems with your mail delivery, please don’t contact me.
So just to recap:
1st prize :
– a Midnight Blue — Bushmaster Bubbler, just like the hippy smokes
– 10 x glass gauze — jack style
– an autographed photo of me***
2nd prize (5 of these)
– a Smiley Face — Head Case — Pop Tin for your stash, just like the hippy uses
– an autographed photo of me***
3rd prize (10 of these)
– Dragonfly Kingsize Premium Flavoured Papers, because they’re yummy
– an autographed photo of me***
4th prize
there is no fourth prize, sorry.
Entering my contest couldn’t be easier, simply drop by my north London lair and perform an extended act of oral love upon me and you’ll have a good chance of winning.
Perhaps that’s not easy enough, as not that many of you can get to north London, so lets simplify it a bit more…
Entering my contest is as easy as sending me an email, there’s no cost at all. Just shoot one to:
and make sure you put:
Gimme your bubbler you crazy hippy!!
in the subject line!
You can do that. Your granny could do that, though why she’d want my bubbler, I really couldn’t say. At her age, a vape is probably a better bet, anyway.
Now the boring, tedious, legal disclaimer bit. Such a bummer, what a bring down, I wish I knew how to shrink the font so it could be proper “fine print”, but I can’t. I’m stoopid. Anyway, here goes.
1) The contest is open to residents of the United Kingdom (including NI) and the European Union only. Sorry, but I don’t want to be filling out customs declarations for water pipes.
2) You’ve got to be 18 years or older. For real, and a fake ID won’t do it. If you’re under 18, you probably shouldn’t be here anyway, though I guess telling you that will make you want to stick around even more. You still can’t enter the contest. Don’t worry, there will be other contests and if I keep running this site long enough, eventually you’ll all be old enough to enter.
3) Entry closes at midnight (BST) on Thurs 1st May 2008 and any entries received after this time will not be considered valid. I am giving you nearly a month and how long does it take to send an email?
4) If you are selected as the winner, you will need to supply a valid postal address. You can use a fake name if you like, but you need to use an address where you can receive it, especially the bubbler, because that won’t fit through your letterbox, even if the other prizes will. I won’t be using a real return address, so if it doesn’t get to you, it doesn’t come back here either.
5) It’s my contest and they’re my rules and what I say goes. I’ll pick the winners and I’ll let you know by email if you’ve won. If you haven’t heard back from me, asking for your address, then on this occasion your entry was unsuccessful, but best of luck in the future. (last sentence lifted from every rejection letter I’ve ever received, mainly from ex-girlfriends)
6) I’m the judge too and the judge’s rulings are final
7) Purchase not necessary…it’s not even possible since I don’t sell anything directly!
8) The rules are subject to change without notice and everything is at my discretion. (this is number eight)
9) Participating in this contest does not effect your statutory rights
10) Your mileage may vary
11) This contest is void in your area if prohibited by local law
12) No guarantees will be undertaken in the delivery of the prize, if the postal service loses it, we all lose!
13) The hippy is in no way responsible for anything that might happen as a result of you winning the prize or what might follow after any possible use of the prize. If you get in trouble with your parents, your partner or the police, it is your responsibility, not the hippy’s in any shape or form. The winner is solely responsible for everything! You can’t blame the hippy for jackshit, so don’t even try, fuckers!
14) If I think of anything else, it counts and you can’t sue me for it. I’m just trying to do something nice for my fans, don’t hate me for that!
==================================================================
***There are actually not going to be any autographed photos. Would anyone really want one anyway?
People are always going on about the dangers of illegal drugs, but precious little gets said about the abuse of pharmaceutical medications. Since the death of actor, Heath Ledger, that’s starting to change.
Check out THIS ARTICLE from today’s Observer newspaper, please.
The only quote I’m going to reproduce, is a small bit from the tease at the top of the page:
“…misuse of over-the-counter pills now kills more Americans than illegal drugs.”
I have to put my hand in the air and admit I didn’t know that. Did you?
Of course I know pharms are dangerous, any drug can be dangerous if used irresponsibly or recklessly, but I didn’t realise that they were killing more Americans than street drugs.
The only prescription drug I’ve really taken recreationally is Valium and that was usually to make the come down from other drugs easier. And that’s it. In other words, I don’t have much first hand experience of recreational pharm use.
I certainly can see the temptation though. Swallow a pill, get high. Simple, clean and effective.
I also know that prescription pills are fiercely addictive. And I know that taking too many can lead to death.
People turn to legal drugs, well, because they’re legal. They’re also cleaner and less likely to be cut with any old rubbish. The dosages are consistent, the manufacture controlled and regulated and the distribution, if you have a prescription, is from a nice, well lit shop selling them at reasonable prices, along with loads of other useful goods. Why not pick up a handy home First Aid kit, while you’re there?
People also turn to pharms because what they might prefer, is illegal, possibly cut with any old rubbish, with inconsistent dosages, poor manufacturing conditions and sold by some creepy guy in the back of a pub or on a street corner in the bad part of town, at night.
Do you see where I’m headed.
If proper recreational drugs, like my beloved weed were legal and a safe supply was available, then more people would smoke dope and less people would abuse pills, ergo: less people will die prematurely.
The illegality of preferable substances is the main thing driving decent folks to abuse what’s in their medicine cabinets.
If you piss-test positive for cannabis in a work-drugs test, you’re fucked. If you come up positive for opiates, you just say you have a “bad back” and no one blinks an eye.The fact that you go home and pain pills with a litre of Stoli is your little secret…until your body is discovered lying in a pool of sick, in your bed and you’re not breathing!
Look, no drug is safe, but all drugs can be made safer if you have the right information and don’t fear seeking it out. Crossing the street’s not safe, but we make it safer by learning to look both ways. “Harm reduction” is what its called and with drugs too, you can reduce the chances of problems with a little bit of knowledge.
In light of this tragedy taking place in America, I am issuing an open call to all lawmakers there to set an example to the world and legalise all recreational substances! Let’s reduce the number of Americans who are dying from the effects of prescription drug abuse and give them the choice of safely enjoying the goodies of their choosing!
Who am I kidding? America will just declare war on chemists or doctors, or the prescription meds themselves. That’s the more their style. There’s more of a chance of them doing that, than anything remotely sensible…
Happy fucking February, fuckers!
February is one of my favourite months, because its the shortest. It breezes right by like nobody’s business, though this year there’s an extra day, because its leap year. Great.
January was hardcore for me, I worked way too much and slept way too little. Last night I slept 14 continuous hours. I guess I needed it. February is going to be easier.
I’m not working as much this month, partially by design. I’ve got to sort out a few things that are only possible in the daylight and I want to deal with a few personal matters as well.
Hopefully this also means that you guys will be seeing a bit more from me, though I didn’t do that badly in January, considering my lack of free time. Maybe its all the coffee!
Since I got my new coffee set-up, I am drinking lots more of the stuff and I am buzzing on caffeine like crazy. It means I have to smoke even more weed to stay mellow, so its like I’m grooving on nature’s grooviest speedball. I’m up, I’m down, I’m up, I’m down and then eventually I’m somewhere in the middle.
I’ve been checking out different beans because I need to learn more about them. I was using blends, but now I am trying some single estates, all roasted to order from the cool website I’ve been ordering from recently. Mrs. H prefers the single bean coffee and I think I do too. I’m trying a different one every few days or so.
My brother and I have been toying with the idea of revamping my website again. This design’s been up for 2 years now, maybe it is time for a change. What would you like to see me do differently?
How about a forum? It would solve my comment problem. I miss having people comment here, but I don’t miss the 1000s of spam-comments I was receiving day after day. Besides, if anyone is going to punt counterfeit viagra on my website, it’s going to be me, dammit! Counterfeit viagra is probably just as effective as the real thing, anyway, because its all just a placebo effect. Swallow this blue smartie and have the increased confidence in your erection, or chew it for a nice chocolately treat!
Or how about a streaming webcam showing you my life 24/7? You could watch me order takeaways and roll spliffs and that’s just at work! At home, you would get to see me cleaning out litter boxes and brewing espressos, often at the exact same time!
Maybe the streaming webcam is a bad idea, since I’d never be able to have another wank again, unless I did it in public and there are far too many CCTV cameras to get away with that, so I might as well just do it at home in front of my streaming webcam and all of you.
There’s not going to be a webcam and there’s not going to be any wanking.
Without the webcam, though, you’ll never know for sure!
Richard Madeley and Judy Finnigan, or “Richard and Judy” as they are known to their legions of fans in the UK are very popular and influential celebrities in this country. When they recommend a book or a wine, it becomes a big seller overnight. What they say to the nation, can change the course of the nation. They hold a lot of sway.
For those of you not residing here in Blighty, I should explain a bit. The couple I’m talking about have been fixtures on our daytime TV screens for many, many years. They are married and after starting out in regional telly, moved on to hosting a national daytime chat show in the mornings on ITV. After many years on ITV and in a well publicised and expensive network coup, made a high profile jump to Channel 4. That’s where theyremain, hosting a programme that goes out weekdays 5pm-6pm.
Normally, I find their views on the conservativeside and in some instances extremely so, which meant I was quite surprised when someone I know drew my attention to a recent Richard Madeley’s column in the Daily Express newspaper.
Yes, the Daily Express of all places!
Rather than tease you with this, I’ll just cut to the chase with the salient quotes:
“RICHARD: How awkward it is to have to begin the new year defending the apparently indefensible… in the form of eccentric police chief Richard Brunstrom’s latest headline-grabbing “gaffe”. I refer, of course, to his call this week on Radio 4’s Today programme for the legalising of drugs.
Brunstrom reckons all currently banned substances – everything from Ecstasy to heroin – will have been decriminalised inside 10 years. He added that Ecstasy is “safer than aspirin”, for good measure.
“Idiotic”, “Mad”, and “Captain Calamity” were just some descriptions of the head of the North Wales force the following morning. Parents of young people who died after taking Ecstasy queued up to castigate him – quite understandably. If my child had perished because of drug abuse, I would be first in line calling for Brunstrom’s head.
Which doesn’t mean I would be right. It is pointless here to get into a statistical debate about the dangers of aspirin versus Ecstasy. Both preparations can kill: Ecstasy by fits following dehydration and other factors, aspirin usually from internal bleeding.
Ecstasy kills around 50 people every year – although many more have a close encounter with the Grim Reaper in their local intensive care unit.
But considering the colossal number of (mostly) young people who swallow Ecstasy tablets in nightclubs up and down Britain every night of the year, the toll is comparatively small when set against those killed or maimed in drink-driving crashes.
Don’t get me wrong, I think taking Ecstasy is stupid.
Prolonged use may well cause memory loss. But being against the law hasn’t stopped it from becoming endemic – which means the criminal supply of Ecstasy and other drugs is endemic too. This is at the root of the gang culture that grips virtually every city in Britain and is largely responsible for the proliferation of guns on our streets. The analogy with Thirties prohibition era Chicago is inescapable.
Personally, I’d feel safer taking a palmful of aspirin than even one Ecstasy. But as a social policy, the criminalisation of drugs must surely be recognised for what it is: an abject failure. Cocaine, heroin, speed and, yes, Ecstasy, have never been more widely available or cheaper to buy. Their illegal sale on an industrial scale nourishes a huge, sprawling and hydra-headed criminal underclass.
All Richard Brunstrom – with, by the way, the broad support of his police authority – is really asking is for a sensible debate on how we move on from the failed drug policies of the past.
He may be a ridiculous honorary druid with an irritating penchant for speed cameras and absurdly sensitive to weak jokes about the Welsh, but he’s doing something rarely seen in our chief constables. He is thinking out of the box. That is brave and bold and deserves thoughtful consideration, not calumny.”
Please do click this link to the original article, it starts about 1/2 way down the page.
I was stunned.
I was flabbergasted!
I’m never flabbergasted.
I’m not certain what flabbergasted even means!
Sometimes, common sense comes from very unlikely sources and I must say there was no more unlikely source of these sagely words than Richard Madeley.
I’d like to applaud Mr. Madeley’s bravery and genuine courage for coming out in support of Richard Brunstom and the Police Authority in the pursuit of truth and honesty about drugs.
The next time you’re discussing legalising drugs with someone, quote Richard. Seriously, even to your parents. People really dig Richard and Judy, if you quote him, they will think twice about their beliefs and perhaps even start to question them. Try it and you’ll see what I mean, attaching his name to the cause will give it a new level of respect.
If Richard Madeley supports a complete re-think on drug policy, perhaps there IS something to it!
If more people were willing to stand up and speak out, perhaps things would be better for responsible adults like myself and those of you out there who choose to indulge in the use of unsanctioned substances. There are so so SO many of us out there, who lead productive, normal lives, yet enjoy things other than alcohol and tobacco.
We have too much to lose. That’s the problem, our normalcy and responsible lives don’t meet society’s stereotypes of what a drug user is. If we did step out of the closet and proclaim proudly that we smoke weed, or snort a bit of charlie, or neck a few pills every weekend and it wasn’t destroying our lives, people who disapproved would find a way of destroying our lives for us.
Next week is the public consultation on reclassifying weed. I’m sure people braver than me will attend and speak out eloquently on the subject, before they’re ignored completely and the government just reclassifies it anyway. But that’s not why I’m not going.
I’m not going, because I have too much to lose. As open as I am about my drug use to friends, family, work colleagues, strangers I sit next to on the bus, I don’t know how I’d feel about my name and address being on record with this government in relation to the status of weed and specifically my constant intake of it.
And with this government, how long would it take them before they lost the list and it ended up in the hands of, oh I don’t know, the police maybe! Making cannabis class B means the penalties are worse for the end user; what if they decide to ‘round us all up? They’re building an awful lot of new prisons!
Oh and by the way, the penalties for production and distribution of cannabis, ie growing and dealing, are exactly the same under class B as class C, so it’s really only those of us who might get caught with a small amount who are seeing the penalties change. Thanks, Gordon. Thanks, Jacqui.
What’s worse is that it will only drive those of us who wish to speak out, further underground, while allowing the criminal element to continue ruling the trade, with no additional risks. Who really benefits from this change in status?
That’s an easy question to answer. Who benefits from the reclassification of cannabis?
No one at all.
A few days ago, I learned of a public consultation that’s to be held on the subject of the “possible” reclassification of cannabis. It takes place in London on the 5th of February.
This government has apparently decided the outcome of this consultation and Jacqui Smith has already leaked their decision to put cannabis back into Class B from its current status of Class C.
It widely known that the government has chosen this path for one simple reason, to appear “tough on drugs.” They identified this issue as one which Tony Blair and David Blunkett left them vulnerable to criticism that could be easily changed without much public outcry.
They’re correct on that score. How many dope smokers do you know that would attend a government-held, public consultation on cannabis, and confess to regularly breaking a law, which is about to become a lot harder on people who enjoy weed?
Let’s not bullshit around this…a change in classification from C to B means only one thing and that is to further criminalise people who smoke a bit of dope. The penalties for production and distribution of cannabis are exactly the same under class B and C — exactly the same! The difference is on the otherwise law abiding citizen, who partakes of this plant — the penalties for simple possession are significantly harsher.
Why would the government wish to criminalise so many people? Could it have to do with building new prisons and needing people to fill those places? Dopeheads aren’t dangerous or violent, you would have a prison population that was cheap and easy to manage!
Think that’s a bit “conspiracy theory” even for me? Ok, have you got a better explanation?
Just about every think tank, policy group and genuine expert feels it should be left class C, decriminalised or legalised completely. Many cops believe this too, and so do a fair few MPs and ministers, but many are afraid to voice their opinions for fear of the wrath of the Mail/Express/Telegraph set.
I considered attending that consultation on the 5th of Feb. I thought long and hard about going, stating my real name and reading a selection of entries I’ve written on this subject so near and dear to my heart. And then I pussied out.
Look, either we all go, or none of us go! That’s right, all 6 million (estimated) regular cannabis smokers have to register to attend. Every last one of us. I’ll go, if you’ll all go. They can’t put us all in jail, can they? If they try, we can just seek asylum in the Netherlands!
Here are a few interesting and related links:
This is from the cannazine and talks about the 5th Feb consultation and how they are ignoring the experts in the decision to regrade
Click Me.
This one is from the Independent, it’s the same story, only with some questionable mental health details thrown in to confuse the issue
Click Me.
This is from the Times and talks about how the government should base its policies on science, not emotion. It sites the cannabis “debate” as an example
Click Me.
And here again is my cannabis truth series, which is worth reading if you want to know the real story and not the twisted shit they want you to believe!
Click Me.
I’ve read a bit about Republican presidential candidate. Ron Paul and his rather sensible, if controversial views, but seeing him effortlessly field questions about drugs with rational, intelligent, informed replies is a wonder to behold.
My brother sent me this YouTube clip of Mr. Paul being interviewed by American television network, ABC’s John Stossel and the first two minutes are well worth your valuable surfing time:
I hate to say it, but this guy hasn’t got a hope in hell of winning. I know he’s got loads of support, I know he makes sense, but the powers that be will never allow anyone who talks that straight anywhere near the White House! If it looked like he had a chance, they would cook the election again. Anyway, the chances of him getting the nomination from the heavy christian-fundamentalist-ruled Republican party are slim to none.
It’s a real shame, because it sounds like Ron Paul could make a real difference and America would never let someone with that capability to run the show. Maybe we should all just elect him president of the world instead?
Perusing the internet, as I do, seeking inspiration and of course, cannabis related news, I stumbled upon this little gem, which can be found on quite a few news sites. I’ve opted to use a link to the Reuters News Agency website, as news agencies, especially Reuters and AP, are normally the most unbiased organisations.
Here’s the topline of the report:
I told you it would do your head in! Just imagine how hard it will be for governments around the world to spin this one away!
The evidence in favour of cannabis continues to mount, as witnessed in my “cannabis truth series”, but the fuckers with the power have no interest in truth and seek only to suppress it. Luckily for you, you’ve got me and “truth” is my middle name.
Ok, I don’t have a middle name, my parents couldn’t be bothered. See how goddamn truthful I am!
(Read the northlondonhippy’s cannabis truth series. Go on, learn something cool!)
As well as relaying my own personal experiences with cannabis, I’ve been keeping track of the truth and the lies surrounding my favourite plant for quite a while now. I thought it would a good time to put links to some of my more relevant posts together on one page. I did something similar, but with a more limited scope a couple of months ago, and I left quite a few older entries out.
I’ll aim to update this listing again, in the future, as I add more related content.
So, without further delay, here is “the northlondonhippy cannabis truth series”:
A brief history of the hippy and cannabis — 29 June 2006
“Driven by moral panic” — 9 March 2007
Don’t just take my word for it — 11 March 2007
Class C = Significant Fall in Cannabis Use — 26 October 2007
Science confuses me — 25 October 2007
Acting without thinking, a policy without foundation — 21 October 2007
The rational voices are getting louder, but is anyone in power listening? — 16 October 2007
Finding truth amongst the lies — 24 September 2007
Enlisting in the battle over cannabis — 30 July 2007
Demand and supply — another angle on the status of cannabis — 30 July 2007
It’s not as black and white as they would have you believe — 30 July 2007
But what do real experts say about reclassifying cannabis — 30 July 2007
That Lancet cannabis study, the Daily Mail and the truth — 30 July 2007
Don’t just take my word for it (again) — 30 July 2007
The GUARDIAN of truth — 12 June 2007
False hysteria sells — 27 March 2007
Recently, I’ve been following a particular ongoing battle against cannabis.
This fight is taking place right now, between some very brave people who are running a cannabis cafe in Sussex and the police.
Here’s a report from the local newspaper, covering the case, which will give you a bit of background as well as a snapshot of where things stand today:
http://www.theargus.co.uk/search/display.var.1777072.0.cannabis_cafe_puts_up_the_barricades.php
=========================================
Cannabis cafe’ puts up the barricades
The downgrading of cannabis to a class C drug has led to a series of cannabis cafés opening across Sussex. Police have faced an uphill battle trying to close these illegal premises.
Reporter Miles Godfrey visited an alleged cannabis café in Lancing raided by officers only last week and found a steely determination to defy the authorities.
Officers smashed their way into the building in Freshbrook Road, Lancing, on October 11 using a two-tonne tractor.
They demolished a wall as they ripped a window from its frame and allegedly caused about £20,000 damage to the building and its interior.
However in a show of defiance, the café’s operators have rebuilt the wall, fortified the building and reopened for business in under five days.
The Argus gained exclusive access to the café and inspected the new defences. They include:
# Military razor wire.
# Reinforced steel girders used as height-restriction barriers to prevent tall vehicles gaining access.
# Steel posts and concrete-filled tyres surrounding the building.
A spokesman for the owner, who did not want to be identified, said: “We are back up and running. We were within days of the police raid.”
The people who run the café, which has also been fully repaired and redecorated inside, claimed the police’s “heavy-handed”
One said: “We don’t believe they did a proper health and safety check before the raid.
They have claimed that the building had a steel structure but it doesn’t. It could have easily collapsed completely with everyone inside it.
“As it was, people did get minor injuries, bumps and bruises and one woman suffered an asthma attack. We are worried about what tactics the police are going to use next.”
Those inside the building said they were horrified when officers pulled down the wall.
One said: “It was like something out of a Bruce Willis film.
Somebody could have easily been very badly hurt or even killed.”
Police said they found a “quantity” of cannabis during the raid. Those at the café claim less than four grammes was discovered, an amount they said did not warrant the raid.
The spokesman said: “The police caused about £20,000 damage inside and out during the operation. They employed numerous officers, hired a tractor and for what? They only found four grammes of cannabis so what was the point?”
Officers also found £2,000 in cash on the premises during the raid. The spokesman said the money was from the till and fruit machine and the rest belonged to four different people.
A strict over-18s policy remains in force and staff said they operated a strict ban on alcohol.
The raid was the latest in a series of battles police have had with similar businesses.
Officers have carried out a series of raids across Worthing and Lancing in the last few years as outlets allegedly selling cannabis have sprung up.
Many raids have been successful but others, like the one on October 11 in Lancing, turned up only small quantities of cannabis.
In August, 2005, more than 40 police officers were involved in a dramatic siege at premises in Victoria Road, Worthing. The officers, including a dozen riot police, forced their way through two 6in-thick reinforced doors using steel-cutting welders and a battering ram.
About 30 people were marched outside after police smashed their way into the building, which subsequently closed.
There were raids at the now closed Quantum Leaf and Bongchuffa cannabis cafés in Rowlands Road, Worthing, in 2003. Pro-cannabis campaigner Chris Baldwin ran the Quantum Leaf café as a “political statement” and in January, 2004, received a six-month jail sentence for supplying cannabis.
He served just over six weeks behind bars.
The alleged cannabis café in Freshbrook Road has also been raided before.
In July this year, officers smashed their way into the building using a battering ram.
However they recovered only small qualities of the drug.
Thick black smoke was spotted rising from the premises during that raid and the most recent one.
Officers believe it may have been cannabis being burnt inside but they have been unable to secure enough evidence to bring charges.
Chief Inspector Lawrence Hobbs, Adur district police commander, said police did not want to rush in. He said: “It is early days. We want to gather some evidence, seek some legal advice and listen to how the community want us to deal with it. I do not sense there’s any physical threat to residents.”
However, since February when police first suspected the building was being for drug smoking, his stance has toughened significantly.
He was unapologetic about the damage and said: “There has to be recognition that these types of illegal enterprises will not be tolerated.”
The latest raid was certainly the most dramatic but it may not be the last.
(22nd October 2007)
==================================
Have you ever read anything more ludicrous? You would think they were staging an assault against an Al Qaeda cell, primed and ready to attack a city centre shopping district in the run up to xmas!
Do the police really have the time and budget to be targeting a peaceful, non-violent group of old stoners in such an over-the-top and unjustifiably harsh manner?
The people are continuing to operate this cafe are extremely brave and courageous, for they are taking direct action to protest an unfair and unjust law, which criminalises decent, honest, otherwise law abiding folks for nothing more than smoking a bit of dope!
The police are showing no signs of letting up the pressure, as the follow-up article in another local paper, shows. You can check it out RIGHT HERE and vote in their online poll of whether the police should continue to persecute these good people.
As of this writing, 92% of people responding to the poll, do NOT want the police to continue with this wasteful use of their resources. Or as one of the many people who commented on the article online points out:
“Interesting that the police can spend thousands on harrassing a few old stoners, but were unable to attend when my car had its’ windows smashed by vandals on Tuesday. It’s this low-level antisocial crime that is the problem, not spliff smokers listening to Pink Floyd…”
Think about it, would you rather have the police harassing a group of people sitting inside a cafe, smoking a bit of weed, or would you prefer they go after genuine criminals who might mug your granny for her pension money, or break into your car to steal your stereo?
I think the answer to that is so fucking obvious that it gives me a headache!
Most of the police officers I’ve spoken to personally would like to see cannabis decriminalised or legalised, because they know their time would be better spent tackling real crimes. Why do we disrespect our police forces so much by asking them to waste their valuable time and resources on something so utterly pointless?
Tractors for cannabis raids? Are tanks and F-16’s going to be next? Where does it stop?
I don’t know where, but I do know when. As soon as humanly possible, please!